Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

Revision as of 01:39, 19 November 2004

Quick reference: View the MRC_Documentation:Community_Portal page for a quick documentation site map.

You can also view the documentation via. Categories here: Special:Categories

And our homepage: Macross RPG Community Homepage

Site Layout

The structure of the pages on this Wiki shall follow the following conventions:

• Campaigns will be listed by their full campaign name only. They shall be annoted as part of the "Campaigns" category. Example: Tales from Deep Space.
• Squadrons will be listed by their designation and full name. They shall be annoted as part of the "Units" category. Example: SVA-1485 Sentinels.
• The constituent parts of the Joining process shall be listed only by a relevant name, such as Step by Step Joining, and listed as part of the "Joining" category.
  • Of more direct note: the category listings should be removed from the front of each page name. such as SVA-1485 Sentinels. While it does serve to note what type of page it is, I feel that it is superfluous in our case.
• Statistics resources shall be listed by whatever most-relevant title can be applied to them. Example: OCC SDC Chart. Statistics Resources shall be listed as part of the "Statistics" category.

The Site Hierarchy is depicted in the image below.
File:Proposed Category Structure.gif

-- Xuric and Lanji circa 10:15, 18 Nov 2004 (MST).

Current Notes

Xuric, have you ran accross a way to import perhaps a Tree functionality in JavaScript into the Wiki? the [nowiki] [/nowiki] tags don't seem to do it for me, but you've found a lot more features then I have recently... I'm thinking a folding tree/folding hiarchy function would be nice for the main page once we get things in place.... (just thinking ahead).

BTW, I'm starting a ARCTech documentation sub-category from the EITD sub-category...

--lanji 00:00, 18 Nov 2004 (MST)

I haven't found one built-in to the Wiki system, but, with some tweaking, I'm sure I can whip up one we can make work. --Xuric 10:14, 18 Nov 2004 (MST)

Actually I already have the code we need, its just getting it into the page easily that I was wondering about. I'm sure we can play havic with the source code to make it work though...  ;) --lanji 17:05, 18 Nov 2004 (MST)

I think that what we need is a way to allow more HTML codes to be used in posts. As-is, you cannot even use an <img> tag. I have a feeling that that's why your snippit doesn't work.--Xuric 18:39, 18 Nov 2004 (MST)