Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From MRCDocs
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Current Notes)
m (Cleanup and then some)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
* Statistics resources shall be listed by whatever most-relevant title can be applied to them. Example: [[OCC SDC Chart]]. Statistics Resources shall be listed as part of the "Statistics" category.
 
* Statistics resources shall be listed by whatever most-relevant title can be applied to them. Example: [[OCC SDC Chart]]. Statistics Resources shall be listed as part of the "Statistics" category.
  
<br />
+
The Site Hierarchy is depicted in the image below.<br />
--[[User:Xuric|Xuric]] 14:16, 10 Nov 2004 (MST)
+
[[Image:Proposed_Category_Structure.gif|thumb|Proposed Category Structure Graphic]]
  
 +
-- [[User:Xuric|Xuric]] and [[User:Lanji|Lanji]] circa 10:15, 18 Nov 2004 (MST).
  
One slight change:  Instead of "Squads" category, lets switch it all over to "Units" category (kept looking for a name that could work for multiple groups).
 
 
Also, here's a little picture (that should be a thumbnail) that helps visually show what I'm thinking in the way of Categories Hiarchy.
 
 
[[Image:Proposed_Category_Structure.gif|thumb|Proposed Category Structure Graphic]]
 
 
What do you guys think?  --[[User:Lanji|lanji]] 22:42, 11 Nov 2004 (MST)
 
  
 
== Current Notes ==
 
== Current Notes ==
Line 51: Line 45:
  
 
--[[User:Lanji|lanji]] 00:00, 18 Nov 2004 (MST)
 
--[[User:Lanji|lanji]] 00:00, 18 Nov 2004 (MST)
 +
 +
I haven't found one built-in to the Wiki system, but, with some tweaking, I'm sure I can whip up one we can '''make''' work. --[[User:Xuric|Xuric]] 10:14, 18 Nov 2004 (MST)

Revision as of 17:14, 18 November 2004

Quick reference: View the MRC_Documentation:Community_Portal page for a quick documentation site map.

You can also view the documentation via. Categories here: Special:Categories

And our homepage: Macross RPG Community Homepage

Site Layout

The structure of the pages on this Wiki shall follow the following conventions:

  • Campaigns will be listed by their full campaign name only. They shall be annoted as part of the "Campaigns" category. Example: Tales from Deep Space.
  • Squadrons will be listed by their designation and full name. They shall be annoted as part of the "Units" category. Example: SVA-1485 Sentinels.
  • The constituent parts of the Joining process shall be listed only by a relevant name, such as Step by Step Joining, and listed as part of the "Joining" category.
    • Of more direct note: the category listings should be removed from the front of each page name. such as SVA-1485 Sentinels. While it does serve to note what type of page it is, I feel that it is superfluous in our case.
  • Statistics resources shall be listed by whatever most-relevant title can be applied to them. Example: OCC SDC Chart. Statistics Resources shall be listed as part of the "Statistics" category.

The Site Hierarchy is depicted in the image below.
File:Proposed Category Structure.gif

-- Xuric and Lanji circa 10:15, 18 Nov 2004 (MST).


Current Notes

Gonna make things a little easer... placing new entries at the top.
MRC Staff... please look at the Squads Portal and enter the data you have for any of the squads you GM.
Also, you might update your information on the MRC Staff Page.
--Xuric 22:00, 5 Nov 2004 (MST)

A note on the load-times for this site: There's a lot of data that has to be processed by the system before it's spit out for viewing. THAT is where most of the load-time comes from. So far, the only images are the Wiki logo, and some on special pages. Best of luck to y'all with dialup. --Xuric 09:10, 5 Nov 2004 (MST)

Run with it Xuric. Personally I like Squadrons spelt out rather then just Squads, but I'll live with what we have. ALSO, I think we can soon remove Portal pages, and just link to the Categoies page that is automatically setup, reducing our load.

On thing I'm worried about, we have some groups that can not be considered Squadrons, what should we do about them?

--lanji 15:25, 8 Nov 2004 (MST)

Wow... completely missed the above comment for days. Sorry 'bout that.
I agree that "Squadrons" would sound better, but your "Units" idea trumps all. Once I have the opportunity, I'll make the changes accordngly. Until then, I ask the creator of each Units' page to change their categorization over to "units."--Xuric 07:51, 17 Nov 2004 (MST)


Xuric, have you ran accross a way to import perhaps a Tree functionality in JavaScript into the Wiki? the [nowiki] [/nowiki] tags don't seem to do it for me, but you've found a lot more features then I have recently... I'm thinking a folding tree/folding hiarchy function would be nice for the main page once we get things in place.... (just thinking ahead).

BTW, I'm starting a ARCTech documentation sub-category from the EITD sub-category...

--lanji 00:00, 18 Nov 2004 (MST)

I haven't found one built-in to the Wiki system, but, with some tweaking, I'm sure I can whip up one we can make work. --Xuric 10:14, 18 Nov 2004 (MST)